The Internet has everything, it seems; of course, there's plenty of history among the billions of Web pages out there - but there are also clear signs of the future.
First the future. Some music distribution services have apparently come to the (apparently correct) conclusion that no matter how many software routines they put in MP3 files to prevent them from being copied, and no matter how many people they try to sue for sharing illegally downloaded music files, they are basically trying to hold back a tidal wave by sticking their fingers into a very holey dike.
Seen from that perspective, EMI's decision isn't "forward looking" or "radical" - looking for a new financial model really is their only option! The Chinese court said that the Baidu site could not be held responsible its use by individuals to download copyrighted content, a decision that basically means that, if the major music labels want to halt piracy in China (a country notorious for piracy), they are going to have to sue a few hundred million Chinese. Trying to figure out other ways to make money off your assets seems like a lot better way to spend your time and talent that sicking lawyers on all and sundry who violate your copyrights.
Next in line to learn this lesson were the TV networks in the U.S. The "copyright line" for television programs has always been less clear than for music, which you had to go to a store to purchase if you wanted a hi-fidelity copy. SInce the invention of the video recorder, however, the same (or close enough) quality video presentation has been available for free to viewers who watch when their favorite show is on, as it is to those who recorded their program to watch later or to archive. The free to air networks (CBS, NBC, etc.) already essentially "give away" their creations for free use by the consumer, and support the practice with advertising. Looking at it from this perspective, sharing TV programs in digital file form - which one could have watched or recorded for free anyway - is not as major an issue as downloading copyrighted music. The question of "free" sharing is a little less relevant to cable TV, which you have to pay money to view - but with cable so ubiquitous, and most people interested in getting a digital file of cable programming already a subscriber anyway, that point is almost moot. Or so goes the thinking among many who write me about this issue.
Peekvid, for those who came to know it during its relatively short life, was a site where viewers could watch copyrighted movies and TV shows to their heart's content. You watched the programs or movies on-line as they streamed to your computer; the quality wasn't particularly high and you had to wait for the stream in order to watch the show, but there it was. No more, though, as rumors abound that the same Fox network threatened the proprietors of Peekvid with all sorts of legal hell if they didn't shut down their operation.