Apple TV, the product that is (was) supposed to do for video what iPods have done for music - i.e., sell a lot of media product for Apple - was released to the public exactly one week ago, on March 20.
By the time the weekend came around, though, the hackers had managed to get it to perform all sorts of tricks that one could imagine were not part of the skill set Apple had in mind for the product - because these tricks could potentially interfere with the income stream the company no doubt saw itself grabbing.
And therein lies a lesson: No matter what restrictions manufacturers of hardware or software, and no matter what rights management restrictions TV, movie or music producers encode in their digital files, someone, somewhere is going to crack it - and word, as well as the crack, will spread very quickly.
To get the files onto the Apple TV hard drive, you sync up the device with the computer where your iTunes audio and video files are stored. Using the easy to follow menus you sync up the computer's files with the device's (the first sync is far faster if you physically connect the Apple TV to your home network, as opposed to relying on wireless transfer; incremental syncs can then be done wirelessly).
If this sounds like something you should be able to do with a regular PC equipped with a TV card to connect to a television and a home network connection - you're probably right. From what I can tell, Apple TV is like a Mac Mini with a dedicated operating system that focuses on media (if this sounds to you like the Vista Media Center I've been discussing for the past couple of weeks, you're right - it does to me, too). So why not just invest in a PC with a TV card, etc? Because Apple TV is cheaper; for $299, you get a basic media machine that will serve as your, well. media server. If you've got an extra computer lying around, of course, you could get a TV card and a set of cables for a lot less, but if you don't, Apple TV is a reasonably priced alternative. Of course, for a little more, you could get a fully functional Mac Mini with a faster processor. or a PC with the TV card that will do lots of stuff besides serve up media to your TV. Indeed, Apple TV really is a scaled down PC, those who have dissected it say.
That's where the hacking community comes in. It took them just a couple of days to come up with a series of tricks that can transform an Apple TV into a useful media center for any purpose, able to play files with many more codecs than Apple intended. We really do have to salute these folks, for being willing to potentially sacrifice their $300 by voiding their warranty - a brave move, without question (although from most of the hacking accounts I've seen, nobody managed to mess up their Apple TV so badly that it would not work).
The key was the discovery that the Apple TV's operating system (remember, it's supposed to act as a turnkey unit with no computer-style configuration) is a stripped down version of osX, the current Mac operating system. Since the basic components of the OS were there, reasoned the hackers, there was no reason that what was removed could not be returned!
So just what is the lesson here, anyway? Is it that "the people, united, will never be defeated," as they used to say (way before my time!)? Or, is it that despite their best efforts, large corporations are no match for the ingenuity of the average computer user? Or that the Apple TV phenomenon is just another indication that in the end, democracy and the people always win out, even if the powers that be try to keep them down?
Hey, what do I know - I'm just a geeky computer writer. I do have a question of my own, though. Isn't it strange that Apple would release a product that could so easily be hacked to do the opposite of what its manufacturers wanted it to do - get people top buy videos from the Apple Store? If you could easily use Apple TV to move illegally downloaded files onto your TV set, then how does the product help entrench Apple in the video world? Was there nothing they could not have done to prevent these modifications from taking place (I'll answer that one; yes, there are things they could have done). And aren't they aware of how adept the hardware hacker community is? How could they not anticipate these developments?
Like I said - all I can do is ask questions. But it seems to me that you don't get to sell a lot of anything and remain in business for almost three decades by missing the market trends. Which means there must be other reasons, unknown to us at this time (and which cannot be speculated upon at this moment due to lack of space) for the product to be developed and released in this manner. Regardless, one thing is clear; in modern times, any attempt to corner the market on anything is doomed to fail, and if a company wants to make big money, it's got to figure out a way to harness market forces that might otherwise have done it harm in its favor.