That’s the part that concerns us today. For many people, the weather is the most important part of the news; notice how TV stations, even here in Israel, build a cult of celebrity around their weather presenters. The weather person is expected to have a bubbly personality, an ability to josh and banter, a nice, big smile – and the capacity to completely ignore the rest of the news, no matter how bad it is.

In other words, the weather exists in its own little bubble – unaffected by politics or world events. The same rule should apply on the internet, too – but unfortunately, someone forgot to tell the folks at Yahoo that you’re supposed to keep politics out of the weather forecast! And while we wouldn’t venture to argue with professional weather forecasters about troughs, inversions, and cold fronts, we do have some thoughts on the inappropriateness of dividing Jerusalem – not just the city, but the weather forecast! And, to add insult to Yahoo’s injury, even the part of Jerusalem that one would expect to be part of Israel – isn’t!

Hard to believe, but true. If you search for Jerusalem on the Yahoo weather pages, you get two choices – “Jerusalem, Yerushalayim” and “Jerusalem, West Bank.” Not a word about “Israel,” where the city, of course, is really located! That this differentiation is strictly political is evident from the contents of the pages. The weather forecast for both Jerusalems are identical – as one would expect. Meaning that there’s no reason – other than making a political statement – to have two separate pages. I can understand making a political statement, but via the weather? Two words come to mind – “petty” and “ridiculous.”

To be fair, I should point out that the “Jerusalem, Yerushalayim” entry is listed under “IL,” the international abbreviation for Israel. And where is “Jerusalem, West Bank” located? In PS, which one assumes to be the international abbreviation for “Palestine,” an entity that does not legally exist. Whether one likes it or not, the only legal entity in the areas beyond the green line are the IDF and the Palestinian Authority, as stipulated in the Oslo Accords.

Strangely, Yahoo isn’t even consistent with its politics. Both Jerusalem pages list the nearest weather station as being in “Jerusalem, Israel!” Wait, I’m confused; I thought it was “Jerusalem, Yerushalayim.” Does this mean there’s a third Jerusalem, the one with the weather station located in Israel? And those so inclined should not rejoice that Yahoo’s “PS” seems to be a tacit recognition of “Palestine,” a political entity that, for now at least, does not exist at all; according to the category menu, “Jerusalem, West Bank” is located in the “Palestinian Occupied Territories” – another legal fiction, and certainly a step down from “PS!” The inconsistencies just makes Yahoo look all the more foolish.

Unfortunately, the problem goes beyond Yahoo; it turns out that Yahoo’s politicized weather is the default forecast application for iPhones and iPod Touch devices (although I haven’t had the opportunity to check, on iPads, I would imagine that the same application is used). So, if you use an iPhone, as so many people do, you’re stuck with Yahoo’s silly, artificial – and foolishly inconsistent (they can’t even make up their minds!) weather pages.

Perhaps even more interestingly, the professional weather service that provides Yahoo with the forecasts – The Weather Channel – knows better than to play politics. On their site, and on their cellphone applications, Jerusalem – one, single united city – shows up in Israel; there are no political choices here. The Weather Channel itself is actually somewhat right-wing in its weather views, but not “radically” so; you can get the weather for Ariel, Israel, as well as Ramallah, West Bank. At least it makes sense! So it’s clear at whom the finger of blame points for the two Jerusalems; at Yahoo, and Yahoo alone.

Most other weather sites give readers what they came for, without any political baggage. Accuweather lists Jerusalem, Israel (no Ariel, though); so does AOL Weather, and Weather.org, home of the “Weather Underground.” Even the BBC – a news organization we might expect to take as left a view of the Middle East conflict as possible – avoids this problem, by eliminating country names altogether, for many places, not just in Israel, either (I couldn’t figure out the pattern, but it doesn’t appear to be political). So Jerusalem is just that – a stateless city, but a single stateless city. I suppose it’s the best we could expect from them.

Which brings us back to Yahoo. Out of all the major weather sites, Yahoo – and it’s adopted son, the iPhone – is the only one that makes political hay out of the weather forecast. Clearly, the staff at Yahoo needs to be re-educated on a couple of points; the political situation in the Middle East, the legal status of the entities in question, the meaning of the word “consistency” – and the inappropriateness of ruining the one part of the news everyone can enjoy without the headaches of politics butting in, Perhaps a few well-placed letters to the Yahoo folks to help them realize the error of their ways may help?

Related articles by Zemanta

• “Why Do All the Lefties Hate Israel?” (themoderatevoice.com)
• Jerusalem Quotes for Jerusalem Day 2010 (beliefnet.com)

A picture is worth 1,000 words, but unfortunately, you’d need 10,000 to explain those Gaza photos – especially the part about Hamas’ wanting to wipe Israel off the map (http://tinyurl.com/36yv6c), or their unending hate-mongering against Jews (http://tinyurl.com/2j45mr, http://tinyurl.com/3yhvtu, many others). It’s interesting how the anti-Israel crowd never puts this stuff into context, while they can easily find justification for, say, the attack at Mercaz Harav – the “seminary” trains soldiers and settlers, “as long as there is occupation, there will be terrorism,” etc. (no link, as I don’t want to drive up these morons’ page rankings!)

And then there’s Facebook (http://www.facebook.com), the latest tool being used to delegitimize Israel. Facebook, as you (or your kids) know, is a worldwide community of mostly young people who get together to party online. You invite your friends, chat and message, join groups, post photos – it’s sort of like an online pajama party. Personally, I don’t see the point – it’s not like you can make money off of Facebook. Or can you (http://tinyurl.com/3daohc)? Maybe – but probably not too much.

But maybe there are better ways to make money – or spend your leisure time, unless you want to support an organization that is apparently going out of its way to take sides in the Israel-Arab conflict, creating political “facts on the Web.” The Jpost reported last week (http://tinyurl.com/3df835) that residents of Jewish towns over the green line – Maale Adumim, Efrat, Ariel, etc. – are now located in “Palestine,” instead of Israel or even just “West Bank” (the designation other sites sometimes use). Not too long ago, FB was indeed using “West Bank and Gaza” to designate those areas, but at some point added the name Palestine, responding to user complaints (http://tinyurl.com/2vj9hy). While there hasn’t been any comment forthcoming yet from FB on why they’ve decided to resolve the Road Map while negotiations are still ongoing, it stands to reason the site has been responding to public pressure this time as well.

Unfortunately, a look at the Facebook groups (some of which act as sort of Political Action Groups in the FB world) shows more groups favoring “them” than “us.” There were nine pro-Israel groups I could find with over 1,000 members, but more than 20 supporting the Palestinian view of events, including one called “ Every Body who hates ISRAEL JION NOW,” with 988 members, and “Tell Google Earth Jerusalem is Not the Capital of Israel,” with nearly 10,000.

While I think it’s clear where I personally stand on these issues, I can’t begrudge Facebook users their right to express a political opinion. However, I think it’s very unfair of FB to take sides in an ongoing dispute by making official (the creation of a state called Palestine) something that the United Nations has not even decided on yet (http://tinyurl.com/muuqq)! Regardless of what Facebook may want you to believe, there is currently no country (“occupied” or otherwise) called Palestine; the only legal entity at this time representing residents of the designated areas is the “Palestinian Authority” – and Maale Adumim, Ariel, and the others, are clearly not part of the PA, or Palestine. This is not about politics – it’s about historical accuracy, and not submitting to the rule of the mob, dammit – the main reason Facebook apparently made this policy decision too (and there’s a new FB group dedicated to making sure that the boss, Mark Zuckerberg, doesn’t change his mind, called (”Palestine is a Country”). Even if you believe Israel should withdraw to the 1967 lines, there is no call for Facebook – or any other Web site – to be hijacked by propagandists.

Apparently over the weekend, Facebook got the message that they had gone too far, and restored the choice to those living in communities over the green line to list themselves as part of Israel, if they so wish. But Palestine is still listed as a country, which makes me think that more dirty tricks are in the offing. If I were a Facebook member, I’d find a different service to spend (waste?) my leisure time on. And to make it easier for you and FB to part ways, here are some other scandals/problems/issues the site has been involved in recently:

1) Facebook allows spam – lots of it: According to a report by HP Labs (http://tinyurl.com/37w4xy) 43% of messages received on average by Facebook users is spam. Where does the spam come from, since you only communicate with people you want to? Some of it is from groups you join, but another apparently major source is “friend spam” – where people send you applications to try out (http://tinyurl.com/2astou). Of course, you have to become their “friend” – and maybe recruit others, too – in order to get the application. Then, of course, your new “pal” can send you and your contacts anything they want, since you’re all buddies now. FB has promised to do something about it (http://tinyurl.com/2dt4sf), but according to this guy (http://tinyurl.com/3568eb), spam is how FB got to be so big.

2) Facebook could come back to haunt you: “With so much personal information posted online… students could become the victims of pimps or pedophiles, or denied jobs when a prospective employer discovers embarrassing postings during a background check.” (http://tinyurl.com/36zvch). And until very recently (like last month), getting your information off FB when you opted out was near impossible (http://tinyurl.com/yofclu).

3) Facebook Ignores Complaints about Sexual Predators: From a press release by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo that “his office is investigating Facebook over representations the company makes about safety measures” (http://tinyurl.com/ywkxct). Apparently the case was resolved with a promise by FB to investigate predator-related complaints within 24 hours.

And so on – there are plenty of other complaints floating around out there. I know this looks like a “hatchet job,” but it really isn’t – FB has acknowledged and (at least somewhat) acted on each of these issues. But given these issues – and its shabby treatment of Israel – I wouldn’t trust it.